Bibliographic record
Abstract
This book explores how key countries (US, Canada, Sweden, UK) and international organizations (EU, UN, World Bank, Inter-American Development Bank, MAPP/OEA) promoted geographically targeted peacebuilding efforts in Colombia between November 2016 and February 2019 through online subsidies or daily information in news sections of official web pages. This period was marked by the start of the implementation of the peace agreement between the Santos administration and the left-wing guerrillas of FARC, as well as presidential election campaigns and the first six months of government formation after President Ivan Duque took office in August 2018. Drawing on the proposed notion of spatial framing, with the help of NVivo and documentary research, this book assesses which spaces were prioritized by international actors in their daily communications, how those spaces were explicitly labelled and defined with negative and positive references, and which agendas were foregrounded in relation to targeted places of peacebuilding intervention. These questions are used to assess how far differing frames regarding space transformation and peacebuilding reflected consensus, complementarity, dissent or dispersion in the background of two Colombian governments opposed on the peace process, and the implications for consolidating the peacebuilding initiatives of the former government of Juan Manuel Santos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".