MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391349861 · doi:10.18280/mmep.110111

Enhancing Image Quality Through a Novel Multiscale Fractal Dimension Formulated by the Characteristic Function

2024· article· en· W4391349861 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Noor Rashied, Aref Jeribi

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicImage Processing Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFractal dimensionDimension (graph theory)Image (mathematics)FractalQuality (philosophy)Function (biology)MathematicsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceMathematical analysisPure mathematicsPhysicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fractal dimensions have been widely utilized as analytical tools in image processing due to their potential to uncover intricate patterns.This study introduces a novel multiscale fractal dimension (MFD), derived from the characteristic function (CF), which exhibits unique properties, including self-similarity.One significant aspect of image processing research involves the effective reduction of noise, which can interfere with image clarity during transmission.Noise in images poses challenges to their utilization across various applications.In recent years, the strategy of decreasing noise in multiplicative pictures (DNM) has been extensively adopted by researchers to tackle this issue.In this context, the newly proposed MFD is applied to DNM as an innovative method for enhancing image quality.Preliminary results indicate the proposed approach's efficacy, thereby suggesting its potential utility in advanced image processing applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicImage Processing Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207