MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391349950 · doi:10.18280/mmep.110103

Nonlinear Amplifier Effect on High Bit Rate Modulation Techniques Used in WiFi Generation with MATLAB Simulink

2024· article· en· W4391349950 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fatima Faydhe Al-Azzawi, Kamal Kamal, Majida Saud Ibrahim, Saba Dhey Abed

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmplifierMATLABNonlinear systemModulation (music)Computer scienceElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringPhysicsAcousticsBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High bit rate modulation is an essential aspect of next-generation WiFi and plays a crucial role in achieving high data rates and increased network capacity.high-bit rate modulation uses advanced modulation schemes, such as 4096-QAM, to increase the maximum number of bits sent over a particular frequency band.Using nonlinear amplifiers in wireless communication systems will significantly improve the performance of high bit rate modulation techniques, such as 4096-QAM.Nonlinear amplifiers can cause a range of impairments, including intermodulation, harmonic distortion, and amplitude compression, which can affect the transmitted signal quality.It is essential to minimize the effects of these impairments through proper design and optimization of the amplifier to ensure the highest quality possible of the transmitted signal.In this paper, M-QAM with nonlinear amplifier system design and implanted with MATLAB Simulink where in terms of Transmitted and Received spectrum signal and constellation diagram and calculated error vector magnitude (EVM) and modulation error ratio (MER) measurements for 1024, 2048, and 4096-QAM that used in WiFi 6, WiFi 6E, WiFi 7, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.717
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207