MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391360791 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-xqhwg

GelMA-Carbopol bioinks with low total solids content for high-fidelity extrusion 3D bioprinting of dynamic tissue biomimetics

2024· preprint· en· W4391360791 on OpenAlexafffund
David González-Martı́nez, Mabel Barreiro Carpio, Aidee Arizpe Tafoya, Eduardo González‐Martínez, Jeremy A. Hirota, Jose Moran‐Mirabal

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersOntario Ministry of Research and InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsSick Kids Foundation
KeywordsExtrusionBiomimeticsMaterials scienceNanotechnologyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extrusion 3D bioprinting is a technology that allows the deposition of cells within hydrogels in well-defined spatial patterns, facilitating the fabrication of tissue biomimetics. Gelatin methacrylate (GelMA)-based hydrogels are biocompatible, biodegradable, and promote cell adhesion and proliferation, which makes them a common choice to formulate bioinks for extrusion 3D bioprinting. However, due to the low viscosity of GelMA-based inks, it is very difficult to achieve high printability and shape fidelity of complex constructs at physiological temperatures. To overcome this issue, high concentrations of GelMA or rheological modifiers and low temperatures are typically used, with both approaches negatively impacting the printing process and cell viability. The present work develops new GelMA-based bioinks using low concentrations of Carbopol (CBP) (0.1-0.5 wt%) as a rheology modifier. GelMA-CBP inks exhibit excellent rheological properties and outstanding printability at physiological temperatures (37 ºC) and at low GelMA concentrations (1–7 wt%). Complex constructs, including hollow structures with overhangs, were printed at 37 ºC with high shape fidelity using 0.5 wt% CBP. 3T3 fibroblasts embedded within structures 3D printed using GelMA-CBP bioinks exhibited > 90% cell viability for up to 14 days. GelMA-CBP bioinks also enabled the fabrication of a stretchable lung tissue model incorporating primary human lung fibroblasts to study fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition. This work solves the three key issues of GelMA-based bioinks for extrusion 3D bioprinting, by allowing the printing of complex constructs using i) low concentrations of GelMA, ii) low concentrations of a rheological modifier, and iii) physiological temperatures. Our work lays the foundation for using 3D printable GelMA materials in tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, and implantable medical device applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topic3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207