Pear Rootstock Effects on Seasonal Colonization Patterns of Pear Decline Phytoplasma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pear decline (PD) phytoplasma populations were examined over one year in non-symptomatic pear trees with HW620 scions grafted onto three different rootstocks: OH×F87 (PD resistant), OH×F69 (PD susceptible), and Bartlett (PD susceptible). For all three rootstocks, populations were at a maximum during late summer for leaves and shoots, and reached their minimum in mid-winter for shoots and early spring for leaves. In contrast, roots exhibited maximum populations in mid-winter and minimum populations in mid-spring. For all tissue types, PD populations were consistently lowest in trees grafted onto OH×F87 rootstocks, intermediate in those on OH×F69, and highest on Bartlett rootstocks, demonstrating that the type of rootstock significantly impacts PD populations. While OH×F87 rootstocks had the lowest populations, they can still contain relatively high PD populations, particularly during periods with maximum populations. Future research could explore the development of even higher levels of PD resistance in pear rootstocks to reduce PD populations in both the rootstock and scion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".