<scp>Seq2Sat</scp> and <scp>SatAnalyzer</scp> toolkit: Towards comprehensive microsatellite genotyping from sequencing data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate and efficient microsatellite loci genotyping is an essential process in population genetics that is also used in various demographic analyses. Protocols for next-generation sequencing of microsatellite loci enable high-throughput and cross-compatible allele scoring, common issues that are not addressed by conventional capillary-based approaches. To improve this process, we have developed an all-in-one software, called Seq2Sat (sequence to microsatellite), in C++ to support automated microsatellite genotyping. It directly takes raw reads of microsatellite amplicons and conducts read quality control before inferring genotypes based on depth-of-read, read ratio, sequence composition and length. We have also developed a module for sex identification based on sex chromosome-specific locus amplicons. To allow for greater user access and complement autoscoring, we developed SatAnalyzer (microsatellite analyzer), a user-friendly web-based platform that conducts reads-to-report analyses by calling Seq2Sat for genotype autoscoring and produces interactive genotype graphs for manual editing. SatAnalyzer also allows users to troubleshoot multiplex optimization by analysing read quality and distribution across loci and samples in support of high-quality library preparation. To evaluate its performance, we benchmarked our toolkit Seq2Sat/SatAnalyzer against a conventional capillary gel method and existing microsatellite genotyping software, MEGASAT, using two datasets. Results showed that SatAnalyzer can achieve >99.70% genotyping accuracy and Seq2Sat is ~5 times faster than MEGASAT despite many more informative tables and figures being generated. Seq2Sat and SatAnalyzer are freely available on github (https://github.com/ecogenomicscanada/Seq2Sat) and dockerhub (https://hub.docker.com/r/rocpengliu/satanalyzer).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".