MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391361869 · doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ad22d4

Dynamical Classifications of Multi-opposition TNOs as of 2023 December

2024· article· en· W4391361869 on OpenAlexaff
Kathryn Volk, Christa Van Laerhoven

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Notes of the AAS · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsCanadian Astronomical SocietyUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsCentaurSolar SystemTrans-Neptunian objectAstronomyPhysicsAstrobiologyAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report the dynamical classifications of 3357 observed outer solar system objects listed as transneptunian objects (TNOs) or Centaurs by the Minor Planet Center. We use the Gladman et al. classification scheme to identify 28 Jupiter-coupled objects (all secure), 168 Centaurs (all secure), 234 scattering TNOs (70 secure/164 insecure), 204 detached TNOs (118 secure/86 insecure), 1650 classical TNOs (1494 secure/156 insecure), and 1073 resonant TNOs (907 secure, 166 insecure). Among the resonant TNOs, the most observationally populated resonance is the close-in 3:2 MMR with 452 objects, followed by the 2:1 with 105 objects, the 7:4 with 103 objects, the 5:3 with 68 objects, and the 5:2 with 56 objects. We discuss a few notable objects here, but all classifications and plots of the 10 Myr integrations are available in a linked GitHub repository.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Notes of the AASSame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207