MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391361869 · doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ad22d4

Dynamical Classifications of Multi-opposition TNOs as of 2023 December

2024· article· en· W4391361869 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Notes of the AAS · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsCanadian Astronomical SocietyUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsCentaurSolar SystemTrans-Neptunian objectAstronomyPhysicsAstrobiologyAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report the dynamical classifications of 3357 observed outer solar system objects listed as transneptunian objects (TNOs) or Centaurs by the Minor Planet Center. We use the Gladman et al. classification scheme to identify 28 Jupiter-coupled objects (all secure), 168 Centaurs (all secure), 234 scattering TNOs (70 secure/164 insecure), 204 detached TNOs (118 secure/86 insecure), 1650 classical TNOs (1494 secure/156 insecure), and 1073 resonant TNOs (907 secure, 166 insecure). Among the resonant TNOs, the most observationally populated resonance is the close-in 3:2 MMR with 452 objects, followed by the 2:1 with 105 objects, the 7:4 with 103 objects, the 5:3 with 68 objects, and the 5:2 with 56 objects. We discuss a few notable objects here, but all classifications and plots of the 10 Myr integrations are available in a linked GitHub repository.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.481
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it