Phase Shifter Optimization in RIS-Aided MIMO Systems Under Multiple Reflections
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examine the problem of joint active and passive beamforming in a controllable multi-user reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS)-assisted downlink and uplink wireless communication system, considering the mutual coupling among RIS elements. Due to the sub-wavelength structure, mutual coupling among RIS elements is unavoidable, and it inherently leads to multiple reflection effects that are ignored in conventional (approximative) RIS models. We formulate a joint non-convex problem under the MMSE criterion and use alternative optimization to convert the non-convex problem into two sub-problems for downlink and uplink transmissions separately. In both transmissions, one sub-problem involves optimizing the phase-shift matrix of RIS. In downlink, the other sub-problem is the optimization of active precoding for the base station (BS), while the equivalent sub-problem in uplink is the optimization of the linear receiver matrix. We optimize the phase shift matrix under a physically-consistent model using the gradient descent algorithm for both transmissions. We use the Lagrange multiplier method to optimize active precoding in the downlink and apply the First Order Necessary Condition (FONC) to optimize the linear receiver in the uplink. Simulation results are represented for both lossless and lossy RIS scenarios under perfect and imperfect channel state information. We discuss the impact of changing the number of RIS elements and the RIS element spacing on system performance. The results show that, with optimized phase shifts and active precoding, the inherent multiple reflection effect can improve the performance of RIS-aided wireless communications systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".