Symmetries and Integrability of Difference Equations (SIDE VI)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This special issue of the Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics is devoted to the sixth SIDE (Symmetries and Integrability of Difference Equations) meeting, held 19-24 June 2004 at the Kallvik Conference Centre in Helsinki, Finland.The papers gathered here are refereed contributions from researchers in the field of discrete integrable equations on topics related to the main themes of the SIDE VI meeting.This collection serves as more than just a proceedings for SIDE VI as many papers were submitted in response to a call for papers sent out soon after the meeting.The first meeting of the SIDE series took place at Esterel, Canada, in 1994.Since then meetings have been held every two years: at Canterbury, UK (1996), Sabaudia, Italy (1998), Tokyo, Japan (2000), and Giens, France (2002).Proceedings have been published for each meeting.The second supplement to volume 10 of the Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics was devoted to the SIDE V meeting in Giens.SIDE V and SIDE VI were both EuroConferences organised and supported by EURESCO.The two meetings were planned at the outset to emphasize different aspects of this expanding field of research.The SIDE V meeting emphasized Discrete Painlev equations and the solvability of difference equations while the SIDE VI meeting emphasized Analytic difference equations, special functions and quantum models on the lattice.Specific themes of SIDE VI included the following. Analytic difference equations and spectral theory Difference bispectral problems Difference Galois theory Q-hypergeometric and elliptic modular functions Representation theory and orthogonal polynomials Algebraic curves and addition formulae of Abelian functions
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it