Japanese female writers watch a boy being beaten by his father: female fantasies of male homosexuality, psychoanalysis, and sexuality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Features of male homosexuality are not conclusively limited to issues surrounding male (sexual) desires and their idealization.This is shown precisely in the fact that many (Japanese) women concern themselves so much with depictions of male homosexual subjects, both through writinF and reading imaginative narratives concerning male homosexuality.Considering the fact that (Japanese) women writers (Mori Mari, Kono Taeko, Okamoto Kanoko, Matsuura Rieko, to name but a few) pursue particular themes of male homosexuality grounded in imaginative diegesis, it becomes apparent that, in the process of exploring incredibly complex (female) gender formations and relations, male homosexual fantasies can (and should) be positioned as one of the initiating discursive points from which female desires are originated (and are subconsciously repressed).In order to demonstrate that the discourse of female sexuality incorporates male homosexual fantasies into its context, in this paper I shall specifically explore a psychoanalytic approach, basing my primaty analysis on Sigmund Freud's famous article "A Child is Being Beaten."In "A Child is Being Beaten," Freud investigates the complicated structure of female fantasy in relation to female sexual desires, considering the conditions and effects of the degrees and types of female subjectivity.In terms of the narrative which Freud presents, 1) on the first level, the child is being beaten by the Father: the impulse of sexual desire is represented as sadistic; 2) on the second level, I (the referent) am being beaten by the Father: the impulse of sexual desire is represented as masochistic, and the situation is subjectified; 3) on the third level, I (the referent) am watching the child being beaten by the Father: the impulse of sexual desire is represented as scoptophilic, and the situation is objectified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".