MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391374950 · doi:10.5181/ncetology.11.0_37

Impressions of killer whales held by two Northwest Coast Indian groups Resident-and transient-type killers whales in British Columbia

2001· article· en· W4391374950 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Keiko Takahashi

Bibliographic record

VenueNihonkai Cetology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhaleFisheryGeographyOceanographyTransient (computer programming)Type (biology)HistoryGeologyBiologyPaleontologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Northwest Coast Indians living along the Pacific Coast from Southeastern Alaska, British Columbia to Washington,are hunters-gatherers who traditionally depended greatly upon marine resources for food. Indians of this area categorised killer whales (Orcinus Orca) into two types, resident killer whales and transient killer whales. Resident killer whales range in Discovery Passage during the summer, and eat fish there. Discovery Passages corresponds to the summer range of resident killer whales, “tribal” boundaries, as well as watershed and tree community boundaries. Transient killer whales, eating primarily marine mammals, are observed on the Pacific (west) west side of Vancourver Island. In this paper, I will compare observations of people on the east-side of Vancouver Island with those of people on the west-side of Vancouver Island. The Kwakwaka'wakw people live along Discovery passage, on the east-side of Vancouver Island and the main land. They observe resident killer whales every summer. Transient killer whales sometimes pass through Discovery Pass, and are considered as gods of longevity for Kwakwaka'wakw. The Nuu-chah-nulth People live along Pacific, or west-side of Vancouver Island. They observe transient killer whales throughout the year, and resident killer whales during the summer. They were a whaling people hunting grey whales in the Pacific. Transient killer whales catch small marine mammals in both Discovery Passage and the Pacific. But they catch whales only in the Pacific. Wolves, a special category among all animals for Nuu-chah-nulth people, are believed to be killer whales that emerged from the sea to live on the land. The impression held by peoples of the east and west coasts of Vancouver Island differ because: 1.The different types of killer whales (resident and transient) observed. 2.The Kwakwaka'waku are primarily salmon fishers with whom the killer whales compete, while the Nuu-chag-nulth are whalers. The Kwakwaka'waku are salmon fishers who depend largely upon the late summer to fall salmon run in the Discovery Passage. Resident killer whales also congregate in the Discovery passage at the same time to eat salmon. The Nuu-chag-nulth also are fishers but depend more on large whales. Thus, both humans, the most powerful land-based predators, and killer whales, the most powerful aquatic predators, both depend upon marine resources. In other words, both humans and killer whales take food from the ocean on the east and west sides of Vancouver Island.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNihonkai Cetology→Same topicMarine animal studies overview→French-language works237,207→