MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391375417 · doi:10.4000/criminocorpus.14694

Le Musée du Barreau de Paris, histoire et avenir

2024· article· fr· W4391375417 on OpenAlexaff
Basile Ader, Cindy Geraci

Bibliographic record

VenueCriminocorpus revue hypermédia · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedieval and Early Modern Justice
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtPolitical scienceHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Il n’existe aujourd’hui aucun musée relatif à l’avocature en France, pas plus que de Musée de la Justice. Le Musée du Barreau qui appartient à l’Ordre des Avocats à la Cour d’appel de Paris est, à ce titre, une institution unique. Il a pour mission la transmission et la valorisation de l’histoire des avocats. Héritiers des avocats du Parlement de Paris, les avocats parisiens ont constitué un patrimoine important, constitué de livres, d’objets d’art, de peintures, sculptures, gravures, médailles, manuscrits…, enrichi au fil des siècles. Ses collections privées, comportant plus de 12 000 œuvres et livres, concernent l’histoire des avocats et, plus généralement celle de la Justice. Voici un aperçu du Musée du Barreau de Paris, de ses origines à nos jours.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCriminocorpus revue hypermédiaSame topicMedieval and Early Modern JusticeFrench-language works237,207