Eficacia de una intervención educativa escolar para la prevención de la obesidad infantil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introducción. La prevalencia de obesidad infantil se ha incrementado de forma considerable desde el año 2000 adquiriendo la dimensión de epidemia, al presentar el 5,9% de los niños menores de 5 años sobrepeso. Entre los factores causantes modificable se encuentran el estilo de vida, sueño, dieta y actividad física. El objetivo es evaluar la eficacia de una intervención educativa en entorno escolar para la modificación de hábitos de niños de 6-12 años en 3 áreas, dieta, actividad física y tiempo de pantalla. Metodología. La muestra es de 540 niños, en etapa de educación primaria distribuida, en tres grupos: a) intervención dieta y tiempo de pantalla, b) actividad física y tiempo de pantalla y, c) dieta, actividad física y tiempo de pantalla. La intervención educativa incluye contenidos del método plato, pirámide de alimentación y ejercicio basados en la guía canadiense de actividad física para niños de 5-11 años. Se recopilan variables de edad y medidas antropométricas. En instrumentación se considera el Test KIDMED (adherencia a dieta), Cuestionario “IPAQ-A” (actividad física), cuestionario tiempo de pantalla (uso dispositivos electrónicos). La recopilación de datos se realiza pre-intervención, post-intervención y al mes de finalización de la intervención. El análisis considera estadística descriptiva para la distribución y valores de las variable cuantitativas y cualitativas y, estadística analítica para el análisis de la eficacia la intervención según corresponda al tipo de variable tales como la prueba de t de Student, ANOVA, Chi cuadrado, prueba de Correlación de Pearson. Los datos serán analizados con el sistema estadístico SPSS. ABSTRACT Introduction. The prevalence of childhood obesity has increased considerably since 2000, acquiring the dimension of an epidemic, with 5.9% of children under 5 years of age being overweight. Modifiable causative factors include lifestyle, sleep, diet and physical activity. The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational intervention in a school environment to modify the habits of children aged 6-12 years in 3 areas, diet, physical activity and screen time. Methodology. The sample is 540 children, in primary education stage distributed, in three groups: a) diet and screen time intervention, b) physical activity and screen time and c) diet, physical activity and screen time. The educational intervention includes contents of the plate method, food pyramid and exercise based on the Canadian physical activity guide for children aged 5 to 11 years. Age variables and anthropometric measurements are collected. In instrumentation, the KIDMED Test (diet adherence), “IPAQ-A” Questionnaire (physical activity), and screen time questionnaire (use of electronic devices) are considered. Data collection is carried out pre-intervention, post-intervention and one month after the end of the intervention. The analysis considers descriptive statistics for the distribution and values of the quantitative and qualitative variables and analytical statistics for the analysis of the effectiveness of the intervention as appropriate to the type of variables such as Student's t test, ANOVA, Chi square, Pearson correlation. The data will be analyzed with the SPSS statistical system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".