El ambiente virtual y las proyecciones profesionales de estudiantes-docentes en Uruguay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo de este estudio fue identificar las percepciones sobre la dinámica docente en los ambientes virtuales y las proyecciones profesionales del conjunto de estudiantes que cursaron, en el año 2020 la carrera de profesorado en la modalidad semipresencial, en el Instituto de Formación Docente de Uruguay. Se realizó un estudio mixto, con datos extraídos de una encuesta online distribuida al total de los estudiantes involucrados, tres grupos de discusión y cuatro entrevistas en profundidad. Este colectivo de futuros profesores, en ejercicio de la profesión en Enseñanza Media, identifican un rol docente fuertemente asociado a la atención integral de los estudiantes en entorno virtual, orientado a generar un vínculo afectivo por sobre los aspectos disciplinares específicos. Perciben una acentuada desvalorización social de la docencia y la mitad de ellos se proyecta profesionalmente fuera del ámbito educativo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".