A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study of the Effects of βGln114 Mutation on the Dynamic Behavior of the Catalytic Site of the Tryptophan Synthase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L -tryptophan ( l -Trp), a vital amino acid for the survival of various organisms, is synthesized by the enzyme tryptophan synthase (TS) in organisms such as eubacteria, archaebacteria, protista, fungi, and plantae. TS, a pyridoxal 5′-phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzyme, comprises α and β subunits that typically form an α 2 β 2 tetramer. The enzyme’s activity is regulated by the conformational switching of its α and β subunits between the open (T state) and closed (R state) conformations. Many microorganisms rely on TS for growth and replication, making the enzyme and the l -Trp biosynthetic pathway potential drug targets. For instance, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Chlamydiae bacteria, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Francisella tularensis, Salmonella bacteria, and Cryptosporidium parasitic protozoa depend on l -Trp synthesis. Antibiotic-resistant salmonella strains have emerged, underscoring the need for novel drugs targeting the l -Trp biosynthetic pathway, especially for salmonella-related infections. A single amino acid mutation can significantly impact enzyme function, affecting stability, conformational dynamics, and active or allosteric sites. These changes influence interactions, catalytic activity, and protein–ligand/protein–protein interactions. This study focuses on the impact of mutating the βGln114 residue on the catalytic and allosteric sites of TS. Extensive molecular dynamics simulations were conducted on E(PLP), E(AEX 1 ), E(A–A), and E(C 3 ) forms of TS using the WT, βQ114A, and βQ114N versions. The results show that both the βQ114A and βQ114N mutations increase protein backbone root mean square deviation fluctuations, destabilizing all TS forms. Conformational and hydrogen bond analyses suggest the significance of βGln114 drifting away from cofactor/intermediates and forming hydrogen bonds with water molecules necessary for l -Trp biosynthesis. The βQ114A mutation creates a gap between βAla114 and cofactor/intermediates, hindering hydrogen bond formation due to short side chains and disrupting β-sites. Conversely, the βQ114N mutation positions βAsn114 closer to cofactor/intermediates, forming hydrogen bonds with O3 of cofactors/intermediates and nearby water molecules, potentially disrupting the l -Trp biosynthetic mechanism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".