Deep Structure of the Santos Basin, Offshore Brazil From 3D Inversion of magnetotelluric Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The relationship between deep crustal structure and the deformation in the overlying sedimentary wedge in Santos basin, Brazil is not well understood, and the origin and evolution of the salt‐related “Albian Gap (AG)” remain a topic of debate. We investigate the deep structure using three‐dimensional inversion of full tensor marine magnetotelluric (MT) data (of 10 −1 to 10 4 s period bandwidth) from 92 stations along three NW–SE lines in 50–1,700 m water depth, one crossing the Cretaceous hinge line (CHL), AG, and Cabo Frio Fault (CFF). The geological validity of the resulting MT resistivity models was determined using resistivity logs from 11 wells and seismic data. The model shows two regionally persistent electrically conductive layers (C2 and C3) related to key Cenozoic and Cretaceous unconformities in the upper part of the sedimentary wedge. Beneath this wedge, the resistive continental crust is ∼35 km thick across the CHL until the 200 m isobath and thereafter thins rapidly seaward to ∼21 km over a lateral distance of ∼80 km defining a domain of highly extended and faulted crust. Our models show a mantle‐associated basement high and evidence of significant uplift of the lower part of the sedimentary wedge at 100–150 km distance along our central profile which spatially coincides with the AG and a previously proposed Moho high. This implies a mantle‐driven deformation of the crust and basin fill. We propose that mantle flow and magmatism may have played a significant role in the inferred displacement at the AG.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".