Transition to intelligent fleet management systems in open pit mines: A critical review on application of reinforcement-learning-based systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mathematical methods developed so far for addressing truck dispatching problems in fleet management systems (FMSs) of open-pit mines fail to capture the autonomy and dynamicity demanded by Mining 4.0, having led to the popularity of reinforcement learning (RL) methods capable of capturing real-time operational changes. Nonetheless, this nascent field feels the absence of a comprehensive study to elicit the shortfalls of previous studies in favour of more mature future works. To fill the gap, the present study attempts to critically review previously published articles in RL-based mine FMSs through both developing a five-feature-class scale embedded with 29 widely used dispatching features and an insightful review of basics and trends in RL. Results show that 60% of those features were neglected in previous works and that the underlying algorithms have many potentials for improvement. This study also laid out future research directions, pertinent challenges and possible solutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it