MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391396838 · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1371210

Editorial: Community series-extremophiles: microbial genomics and taxogenomics, volume II

2024· editorial· en· W4391396838 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
André Antunes, Rafael R. de la Haba, Mohamed Jebbar, Brian P. Hedlund

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Microbiology · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónMacau University of Science and TechnologyJunta de AndalucíaUniversité de Bretagne OccidentaleCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique
KeywordsExtremophileVolume (thermodynamics)Series (stratigraphy)BiologyGenomicsArchaeaComputational biologyGeneticsGenomeBacteriaGeneMicroorganismPaleontologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The importance of extreme environments and their microbial inhabitants has been gaining visibility. Such environments account for most of Earth's habitable zone by volume (Gold, 1992;Charette and Smith, 2010) and they are sources of valuable new strains and bio-products that will fuel the bioeconomy and will provide new solutions to the current challenges we face in the in areas of human health, energy, environment and agriculture (Antunes et al., 2016;Corral et al., 2019). Developments in extremophile microbiology are increasingly linked with technological improvements in sequencing, bioinformatics, and other upcoming technologies that are opening new paths for scientific breakthroughs and promises to change our understanding of life on Earth. The evolution and physiology of extremophiles remain relevant to investigate the universal ancestor and the limits of life (Merino et al., 2019). The study of extremophiles is also vital to both Astrobiology and Space Microbiology and will support humanity's next steps into space (e.g., Antunes and Meyer-Dombard, 2022;Simões et al., 2023).Within this setting, we hosted the special Research Topic entitled Extremophiles: Microbial Genomics and Taxogenomics (de la Haba et al., 2022). Based on its success, we then launched a second volume as the start of a community series dedicated to this topic. Our new volume includes 14 manuscripts, covering a wide range of areas within the field, with contributions on: i) the discovery of new taxa and genomic-based analysis of their properties; ii) new community-based studies in previously overlooked extreme and poly-extreme environments; and iii) new insights into high taxonomic ranks of extremophiles. The volume was well received, with a total of 77 contributing authors from institutions in 14 different countries spread across the globe, namely Australia, Belgium, Botswana, China, Ethiopia, Germany, India, Italy, Poland, Russia, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, and United States of America.At the time of writing, over 190,000 views and downloads have been recorded for both volumes of the series.The isolation of new extremophiles is vital within this field as highlighted by several contributions to this volume describing new taxa and the use of genomics to uncover some of their remarkable properties.Two papers on hypersaline soils (Odiel Saltmarshes Natural Area, Spain) describe new taxa from this previously overlooked type of environment. In the first paper, Galisteo et al. (2022) describe the novel species Fodinibius salsisoli. Comparative genomics revealed that the species of the genera Aliifodinibius and Fodinibius belong to the same genus, so the authors propose the reclassification of the species of the former into the single genus Fodinibius. Further analysis highlighted abundant but still uncultured representatives of the family Balneolacea in this environment and their potential role as a source of biotin for other organisms. In the second publication from this group, Galisteo et al. ( 2023) describe the new genus Terrihalobacillus, and the new species Terrihalobacillus insolitus and Aquibacillus salsiterrae, both based on several isolates. The genomic features of these new taxa were also analysed, and both were suggested to belong to the rare biosphere of these environments.An additional study by García-Roldan et al. (2023), also focusing on high-salinity environments in Spain (a solar saltern from Isla Cristina, Huelva), describes a new species of Natronomonas, named Natronomonas aquatica. Further genome-based phylogenetic and metabolic analysis of this genus confirmed its phylogenetic coherence, indicated a heterotrophic lifestyle and versatile nitrogen metabolisms, and suggested its ubiquity in midto high-salinity environments.The contribution by Zavarzina et al. (2023) focuses on haloalkaliphiles inhabiting soda lakes in Mongolia and Kenya. In this paper, two new strains of Dethiobacter alkaliphilus, initially described as sulfur/thiosulfate-reducing and iron-reducing bacteria, respectively, were both found to be capable of reducing iron and thiosulfate. Distinct sets of multiheme cytochromes that probably mediate these reactions were identified and their high variation was suggested to be an effective adaptive strategy for occupying geochemically diverse extreme environments.Analysis of the distribution of this genus in natural environments revealed strong connection to alkaline, sulfur-or iron-enriched ecotopes (soda lakes and serpentinite-associated sediments).Soda lakes are geologically ancient ecosystems that are still widespread on Earth and that are thought to harbor archaic microbial communities, but they might constitute secondary habitats for D. alkaliphilus when compared with Fe-rich serpentinites. These results increase our understanding of the metabolic diversity of extremophiles and point to evolutionary traits that could have occurred in prokaryotes during the early stages of the biosphere's evolution, namely when the sulphur biogeochemical cycle overtook the iron cycle as a predominant biogeochemical process.The inspection of the extensive repositories in culture collections can also yield new taxa. The contribution by Montero-Calasanz et al. (2022) looks at isolates deposited at the Leibniz Institute DSMZ in the 1990s that originated from soils in the Atacama Desert, Chile, and landfill leachate from Vancouver, Canada. Analysis of these isolates, which belong to the Geodermatophilaceae, used new genomic data to determine genotype-phenotype correlations within this family. Based on their results, the authors describe and name four novel species in the genus Blastococcus, introduce the new genera Trujillonella, Pleomorpha, and Goekera, and reclassify Blastococcus endophyticus as Trujillonella endophytica, Geodermatophilus daqingensis as Pleomorpha daqingensis, and Modestobacter deserti as Goekera deserti. The authors also emphasize how genomics can effectively replace and/or complement some of the routine phenotypic analyses in microbial systematics.Additionally, two papers from the Daroch group describe new genera of thermophilic cyanobacteria isolated from terrestrial hot springs and name them under the botanical code Trichothermofontia sichuanensis (Tang et al., 2023) and Thermocoleostomius sinensis (Jiang et al., 2023). Both papers also investigate carbon-concentrating mechanisms based on annotations of bicarbonate transporters, carbonic anhydrases, and carboxysome-associated genes. For Thermocoleostomius sinensis, these genes were also shown to be expressed under low-CO2 conditions.The use of molecular methods to analyze microbial community structure and functional diversity in different environments continues to be a formidable tool. This volume includes new community-based studies in previously overlooked or understudied extreme and polyextreme environments in Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.In one of the contributions, Gawas and Kerkar (2023) study sediments from three salt pans, adjoining different prominent estuaries in Goa, India. Marked differences in the unique genera found for each site led the authors to suggest that the different estuaries select for unique bacterial diversity.In another publication, an amplicon sequencing study in the East African Rift Valley analyzes prokaryotic and eukaryotic diversity in three soda lakes, Lake Abijata, Lake Chitu, and Lake Shala, and compares the results with enrichment culture methods (Jeilu et al., 2022). The culture-independent approach captured higher diversity than previously detected in these lakes, provided a more reliable estimate of microbial diversity than traditional culture methods, pointed to differences in microbial community composition among the three lakes, and identified the most commonly found prokaryotic taxa -Pseudomonadota (Halomonas), Bacillota (Bacillus, Clostridia), Bacteroidota (Bacteroides), Euryarchaeota (Thermoplasmata, Thermococci, Methanomicrobia, Halobacter), and Nanoarchaeota (Woesearchaeia) -and eukaryotic taxa -Ascomycota and Basidiomycota.In a different poly-extreme setting, Zhang et al. (2023) assess the prokaryotic taxonomy and potential functional diversity of three hyper-arid soil samples from the Gobi Desert. Their study compares two different next-generation sequencing platforms and identifies 36 bacterial phyla, including Pseudomonadota, Bacteroidota, Bacillota, Actinomycetota, Methanobacteriota, Acidobacteriota, Nitrososphaerota, and Planctomycetota. The authors suggest that environmental factors such as total dissolved salts, available potassium, total nitrogen, and organic matter are positively correlated with the abundance of most groups, and that the community structure was mainly controlled by stochastic processes.Another focus of this section is on metagenomes from geothermal systems. The study by Ugwuanyi et al. (2023) compares metagenomes from different substrates -water, mud, and fumarolic deposits -from Solfatara and Pisciarelli hydrothermal systems in Italy, and reveals a high abundance of pathways for carbon fixation and sulfur oxidation. Another metagenomic study recovered and interpreted Caldarchaeales metagenome-assembled genomes from geothermal features in Hawai'i and Chile and proposes both chemoorganotrophic and chemolithotrophic lifestyles (Balbay et al., 2023).The final highlights of this volume center on studies targeting high ranks in the taxonomy of extremophiles and the new insights that such studies can provide.Looking into new frontiers within this field, Wu et al. (2022) delve into the archaeal class Halobacteria and provide an overview of astrobiology-relevant exposure experiments, identifying key knowledge gaps and research opportunities within this model group of microorganisms. The authors stress that further testing is still needed to fully cover the taxonomic diversity present in this archaeal group both at high and low ranks. This should be

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.135

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0120.007
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0090.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Microbiology→Same topicMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology→French-language works237,207→