Unusual Base Pair between Two 2-Thiouridines and Its Implication for Nonenzymatic RNA Copying
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide 2-Thiouridine (s 2 U) is a nucleobase modification that confers enhanced efficiency and fidelity both on modern tRNA codon translation and on nonenzymatic and ribozyme-catalyzed RNA copying. We have discovered an unusual base pair between two 2-thiouridines that stabilizes an RNA duplex to a degree that is comparable to that of a native A:U base pair. High-resolution crystal structures indicate similar base-pairing geometry and stacking interactions in duplexes containing s 2 U:s 2 U compared to those with U:U pairs. Notably, the C═O···H–N hydrogen bond in the U:U pair is replaced with a C═S···H–N hydrogen bond in the s 2 U:s 2 U base pair. The thermodynamic stability of the s 2 U:s 2 U base pair suggested that this self-pairing might lead to an increased error frequency during nonenzymatic RNA copying. However, competition experiments show that s 2 U:s 2 U base-pairing induces only a low level of misincorporation during nonenzymatic RNA template copying because the correct A:s 2 U base pair outcompetes the slightly weaker s 2 U:s 2 U base pair. In addition, even if an s 2 U is incorrectly incorporated, the addition of the next base is greatly hindered. This strong stalling effect would further increase the effective fidelity of nonenzymatic RNA copying with s 2 U. Our findings suggest that s 2 U may enhance the rate and extent of nonenzymatic copying with only a minimal cost in fidelity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".