Segmental infralesional pathological spontaneous activity in subacute traumatic spinal cord injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/AIMS: There is a dearth of knowledge regarding the status of infralesional lower motor neurons (LMNs) in individuals with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI), yet there is a growing need to understand how the spinal lesion impacts LMNs caudal to the lesion epicenter, especially in the context of nerve transfer surgery to restore several key upper limb functions. Our objective was to determine the frequency of pathological spontaneous activity (PSA) at, and below, the level of spinal injury, to gain an understanding of LMN health below the spinal lesion. METHODS: Ninety-one limbs in 57 individuals (53 males, mean age = 44.4 ± 16.9 years, mean duration from injury = 3.4 ± 1.4 months, 32 with motor complete injuries), were analyzed. Analysis was stratified by injury level as (1) C4 and above, (2) C5, and (3) C6-7. Needle electromyography was performed on representative muscles innervated by the C5-6, C6-7, C7-8, and C8-T1 nerve roots. PSA was dichotomized as present or absent. Data were pooled for the most caudal infralesional segment (C8-T1). RESULTS: A high frequency of PSA was seen in all infralesional segments. The pooled frequency of PSA for all injury levels at C8-T1 was 68.7% of the limbs tested. There was also evidence of PSA at the rostral border of the neurological level of injury, with 58.3% of C5-6 muscles in those with C5-level injuries. DISCUSSION: These data support a high prevalence of infralesional LMN abnormalities following SCI, which has implications to nerve transfer candidacy, timing of the intervention, and donor nerve options.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".