MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391403320 · doi:10.7202/1108996ar

Le plan d’intervention influence-t-il l’implication des parents aupres des eleves en difficulte ? Etude comparative selon les perspectives des parents

2024· article· en· W4391403320 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Enkeleda Arapi, Philippe Tremblay, Serge Larivée

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l éducation de McGill · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParental Involvement in Education
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntervention (counseling)Plan (archaeology)PsychologyDevelopmental psychologyPedagogyHumanitiesGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The individualized education plan is a pedagogical tool designed to support the educational progress of pupils with difficulties. To be relevant, the implementation of the intervention plan must involve the parents. The objective of this paper is to compare the forms of parental involvement with primary school pupils with and without an intervention plan. A comparative quantitative and qualitative analysis is carried out on the dimensions of parental involvement and parents’ perceptions of the school-family-community relationship with 108 parents. The results indicate that the intervention plan does not bring significant differences in the forms of parental implication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.335
GPT teacher head0.469
Teacher spread0.134 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMcGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l éducation de McGillSame topicParental Involvement in EducationFrench-language works237,207