MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Establishing and streamlining the communication and coordination through emergency control room in a tertiary care hospital by upgrading the available resources in the pandemic of COVID-19

2024· article· en· W4391404353 on OpenAlexaff
Latika T. Chugh, Bansari L Chawada, Sangita Patel

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDisaster Response and Management
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Health Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTertiary careCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PandemicMedical emergencyControl (management)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)BusinessMedicineEmergency medicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the COVID-19 pandemic started, a tertiary care hospital of central Gujarat faced problems in developing communication and coordination between the doctors as there was a lack of emergency control room (ECR) set up. This article documents the process of establishing ECR using locally available resources. The department of Community Medicine (CM) was made in-charge of ECR. All information technology (IT) equipment were supplied by hospital administration as per the demand. Various challenges experienced by the staff of CM were discussed with the authorities and specialists from respective departments and quick intermediate solutions were adopted. In July-2020, ECR was established with IT support which accelerated the sharing of laboratory findings and patient details to the treating physician. Dedicated smart phones were assigned to each floor providing real time patient updates through Whatsapp groups and video calling feature was used to establish effective communication between patients and relatives. The hospital also collaborated with a local NGO that provided manpower to address queries at ECR. This study concludes that focusing on utilising local resources and manpower and training the available personnel to handle the problems in the best possible ways made the system work properly at the time of crisis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Community Medicine and Public HealthSame topicDisaster Response and ManagementFrench-language works237,207