MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391404956 · doi:10.1101/2024.01.30.577950

RNA N6-adenine methylation dynamics impact <i>Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis</i> resistance in <i>Arabidopsis</i>

2024· preprint· en· W4391404956 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Leonardo Furci, Jérémy Berthelier, Hidetoshi Saze

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceHakai InstituteOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate UniversityMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
KeywordsBiologyArabidopsisRNAMethylationArabidopsis thalianaGeneticsMutantCell biologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In plants, epitranscriptomic mark N6-adenine methylation (m6A) is dynamically regulated by (a)biotic stressors. However, there is limited knowledge on m6A dynamics at single nucleotide resolution on specific RNA molecule under stresses, and their role in environmental adaptation. By using Oxford Nanopore Technology direct RNA sequencing (ONT-DRS) and a neural network model, here we show transcript-specific dynamics of m6A modification at single nucleotide resolution by biotic stress during Hyaloperonospera arabidopsidis ( Hpa ) infection in Arabidopsis . In wild-type seedlings, pathogen infection causes significant reduction of global m6A ratios, which correlates with activation of m6A-modified transcripts. Defect of m6A deposition in the m6A mutant hakai-1 mimics m6A reduction from Hpa infection at ∼70% of sites, resulting in constitutive overexpression of basal defence genes and enhanced resistance against the pathogen. Our results demonstrate that m6A dynamics impact defence response against pathogen, providing a promising target for future crop improvement strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207