MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391405283 · doi:10.3138/cras-2023-018

L’obscénité intégrale. Pornoculture et vie quotidienne

2024· article· fr· W4391405283 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Vincenzo Susca

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Review of American Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicSexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsINTNatPhilosophyArtHumanitiesPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le porno triomphe et prolifère partout, des mailles du réseau aux contextes urbains, des écrans médiatiques aux interstices du quotidien ; il envahit les trames de la vie publique, surchauffe les connexions électroniques et imprègne d’humeurs la socialité contemporaine. Il se fait ambiance. Quelles sont les origines, la généalogie et l’actualité de cette scène convulsée venue des États-Unis ? Dans une perspective transdisciplinaire embrassant sociologie de l’imaginaire, sciences de la communication, porn et gender studies, l’article analyse et interprète le passage entre la pornographie et la pornoculture en tant que changement fondamental pour nos sociétés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.022
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Review of American StudiesSame topicSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207