Emergence: An Intent Fulfillment System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Network management complexities stem from the multitude of resources, services, and applications that are to be built on top of heterogeneous and distributed infrastructure. To address these complexities, a vendor-agnostic, logical, and abstract view of the infrastructure is essential. Intent-based networking (IBN) helps address complexity by providing a set of abstractions (e.g., functional, data, infrastructure), but the intelligent and automatic decomposition of an intent into a course of actions is a challenging task. In this article, we propose a policy-based approach to model functional abstractions, and decompose intents into a hierarchy of policies. We use closed control loop automation, guided by Finite State Machines (FSM) to execute the policies and deploy the intents. To make our approach widely applicable, we provide a mapping to the Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) Policy Driven Orchestration (PDO) model. We also discuss opportunities for IBN in large language models, and demonstrate our system through a cloud intent that includes a VNF and a health check service.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".