Meščanska oblačila in moda v izvirnih romanih Josipa Jurčiča
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prispevek 1 raziskuje funkcije meščanskih oblačil v Jurčičevih romanih Deseti brat (1866), Doktor Zober (1876), Med dvema stoloma (1876) in Cvet in sad (1877), pri čemer sta upoštevani njihova kontekstualna in meddiskurzivna pogojenost.Zanima nas, v kolikšni meri je literarna pojavnost oblačil povezana z modo in tradicijo.Literarne ubeseditve oblačil preučujemo v povezavi s postopnim oblikovanjem meščanske identitete na Slovenskem in meščanskim odnosom do mode.meščanska oblačila, funkcije oblačil, moda, roman, Josip Jurčič This article investigates the functions of bourgeois clothing in Josip Jurčič's novels Deseti brat (The Tenth Brother, 1866), Doktor Zober (Doctor Zober, 1876), Med dvema stoloma (Between Two Chairs, 1876), and Cvet in sad (Blossom and Fruit, 1877), considering their contextual and interdiscursive conditionality.It investigates the extent to which the literary appearance of clothing is related to fashion and tradition.The literary representations of clothing are studied in connection with the gradual formation of Slovenian bourgeois identity and the bourgeois attitude toward fashion.bourgeois clothes, functions of clothes, fashion, novel, Josip Jurčič 1 Moda, oblačilni videzi, oblačila in njihove funkcije Izbranim Jurčičevim romanom Deseti brat (1866), Doktor Zober (1876), Med dvema stoloma (1876) in Cvet in sad (1877) je poleg oznake izvirni roman, ki je Jurčiču pomenila pripovedna dela, ki so snovno izključno plod pisateljeve domišljije, oprte na sočasno realnost (Kmecl 2009: 78), skupna tematizacija meščanstva, pri čemer se meščanske književne osebe pojavljajo tako v kmečkem kot v (malo)mestnem okolju.Romane združuje zasnovna ost, ki temelji na premoščanju medstanovskih razlik, ki jih briše erotična združitev, pri čemer ima roman Med dvema stoloma nekaj posebnosti.(Kmecl 2009: 80-81).Oblačila kot odličen poetični objekt delujejo na nosilca in okolico z značilnostmi
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".