FPGA-Based Hardware-in-the-Loop Real-Time Simulation Implementation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) simulators have become an essential tool in the automotive industry as they allow comprehensive testing and validation of electronic control units (ECUs), Although HIL simulations are widely used in the vehicle, aerospace and other industries that rely on electronic control systems, they can also be quite challenging to develop. One of the main challenges of HIL simulators is creating a virtual environment that accurately replicates the behavior of the real-world system. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms can be trained on extensive real-world datasets to create more accurate virtual environments of complex systems for HIL simulations. Moreover, latency is a crucial factor in producing a reliable virtual environment for ECU in HIL simulations. FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array) can help to minimize latency in HIL simulations by providing high-performance computing resources. This paper aims to address these challenges by presenting a machine learning-based HIL simulator design on FPGA. The proposed architecture uses FPGA to accelerate the computations of a temporal convolutional neural network (TCN). The paper also describes how increasing the number of input channels can improve the performance of the TCN model on an FPGA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".