MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391418379 · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000208091

Efficacy and Safety of DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection in Cervical Dystonia

2024· article· en· W4391418379 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cynthia Comella, Joseph Jankovic, Robert A. Hauser, Atul T. Patel, Marta Banach, Edvard Ehler, Domenico Vitarella, Roman G. Rubio, Todd M. Gross, Philipp Albrecht, Richard L. Barbano, Norman Bettle, Sylvia Bösch, Françoise Bouhour, James Boyd, Giovanni Castelnovo, Pratap Chand, Christine Cooper, Susan R. Criswell, Khashayar Dashtipour, Andres Deik, Aaron Ellenbogen, Virgilio Gerald H. Evidente, Danielle Feigenbaum, Susan H. Fox, Karen Frei, Jeffrey Gitt, John L. Goudreau, Behzad Habibi, Timothy Harrower, Bernhard Haslinger, Peter Hedera, Daragh Heitzman, Neal Hermanowicz, Jorge Hernández‐Vara, David Isaacs, Stuart Isaacson, Robert Jech, Hyder A. Jinnah, Christopher Kobylecki, Katja Kollewe, Dariusz Koziorowski, Alexandre Kreisler, Rajeev Kumar, Andreas Kupsch, Mark S. LeDoux, Peter A. LeWitt, Ebba Lohmann, Lydia López Manzanares, Irene A. Malaty, Janice M. Massey, Peter McAllister, Peter Moore, Elena Moro, William G. Ondo, Javier Pagonabarraga Mora, Sebastian Paus, Elizabeth Peckham, Rekha Pillai, Monika Rudzińska, Harvey Schwartz, Carlos Singer, Jarosław Sławek, Thomas Sycha, Dariusz A Szabela, Jessica Tate, N. Thakur, D. F. Torres, José M. Trejo, Daniel Truong, Winona Tse, Andrzej Tutaj, Alberto Vásquez, Oldřich Vyšata, Ivana Woznicová, Sharon Yegiaian

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDystonia CoalitionAllerganIpsenH. Lundbeck A/SAdamas PharmaceuticalsUniversity of CambridgeRevanceAcorda TherapeuticsBiogen
KeywordsPlaceboCervical dystoniaRandomized controlled trialMedicineBotulinum toxinConfidence intervalSpasmodic TorticollisPhysical therapyClinical endpointInternal medicineAnesthesiaSurgeryTorticollis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: ASPEN-1 was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy, duration of response, and safety of 2 doses of DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection (DAXI), a novel botulinum toxin type A formulation in participants with cervical dystonia (CD). METHODS: Adults (aged 18-80 years) with moderate-to-severe CD (Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale [TWSTRS] total score ≥20) were enrolled at 60 sites across 9 countries in Europe and North America. Participants were randomized (3:3:1) to single-dose intramuscular DAXI 125U, 250U, or placebo and followed for up to 36 weeks after injection. The primary end point was change from baseline in TWSTRS total score averaged across weeks 4 and 6. Key secondary end points included duration of effect, Clinical and Patient Global Impression of Change (CGIC, PGIC), TWSTRS subscale scores, and safety. Multiplicity-adjusted intent-to-treat hypothesis tests with multiple imputation were performed using ANCOVA and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel analyses. RESULTS: = 0.0006). The median duration of effect (time from treatment until loss of ≥80% of the peak improvement in average TWSTRS total score achieved at weeks 4 and 6) was 24.0 (95% confidence interval 20.3-29.1) weeks with DAXI 125U and 20.3 (16.7-24.0) weeks with DAXI 250U. Significant improvements were also observed with DAXI in CGIC and PGIC responder rates and TWSTRS subscales. Treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 29.6% of participants with DAXI 125U, 23.8% with DAXI 250U, and 17.4% with placebo, with injection site pain being the most common overall. The most frequently reported treatment-related TEAEs of interest in DAXI 125U, DAXI 250U, and placebo, respectively, were muscular weakness (4.8%, 2.3%, 0%), musculoskeletal pain (2.4%, 3.1%, 0%), and dysphagia (1.6%, 3.8%, 0%). DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated that DAXI, at doses of 125U and 250U, is an effective, safe, long-acting, and well-tolerated treatment for CD. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT03608397, submitted July 11, 2018) and EU Clinical Trials Register (ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu EudraCT identifier 2018-000446-19, submitted September 13, 2018). First participant enrolled on June 11, 2018. Trial registration was performed in accordance with the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act (FDAAA 801), which stipulates that the responsible party register an applicable clinical trial not later than 21 calendar days after enrolling the first human participant (42 CFR 11.24). CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that in adults with moderate-to-severe idiopathic cervical dystonia, DAXI reduces dystonia more effectively than placebo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207