It’s uncomplicated: Prevention of urinary tract infections in an era of increasing antibiotic resistance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) rank near the top of the long list of medical issues that can affect humans. They are the most common reason for outpatient visits in the United States (US), and clinics around the world see millions of cases annually. UTIs can be broadly categorized as uncomplicated infections that are usually straightforward to resolve, versus complicated UTIs that because of the pathogen, anatomy or health status of the patient, and/or presence of medical devices such as urinary catheters or stents, are more challenging to resolve. Complicated UTIs are associated with formation of antibiotic-tolerant bacterial or fungal biofilm communities on medical devices during prolonged use, and risk is correlated with duration of device placement Although uncomplicated UTIs are relatively simple to treat, they can be recurrent, defined as 2 or more symptomatic infections in 6 months, or 3 in 12 months, often with the same pathogen If inadequately treated, both types of UTIs can progress to severe disease, including kidney damage and sepsis, with the urinary tract being a major source of bloodstream infections
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".