MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Model-Free Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach to Reach a Robust, Optimal, and Environment-Friendly Power Management in a Micro-Grid

2023· article· en· W4391422956 on OpenAlexaff
M. Nasir Uddin, Yazdan H. Tabrizi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningPhotovoltaic systemComputer scienceArtificial neural networkRenewable energyTurbineGridHyperparameterWind powerHyperparameter optimizationEnvironmentally friendlyArtificial intelligenceEngineeringElectrical engineeringSupport vector machine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study recommends employing recurrent neural networks and reinforcement learning-based approaches to address challenges in micro-grid (MG) power management. The proposed MG contains combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP), wind turbine (WT), photovoltaic (PV), and battery energy storage system (BESS). To effectively estimate the production of 24-hour renewable resources, a multi-layer recurrent neural network (MLRNN) model is developed, trained by historical wind and solar variables dataset. Over previously researched methods, the approach offers advantages, including improved accuracy and extracting non-linear mapping function amongst the features and output. Moreover, the model's hyperparameters are tuned through an auto grid-search algorithm, which leads to a more accurate prediction. The forecasted values, then is employed in next study phase which is optimal power management within MG's generation units. In this regard, a model free reinforcement learning is adopted to keep the multi-objective fuel and CO2emission cost function minimized, to have a robust and environmentally friendly MG. So, a multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is proposed to take the responsibility. The main objective of multi-agent solution is to overcome the challenging issue of finding the optimum operation points in a complicated environment with only one agent, by combining the simpler tasks that each agent does. According to the findings, the proposed MARL successfully dispatch the power generation among renewable resources and micro turbine in CCHP system, optimally. Moreover, the results validate the BESS proper performance in light and heavy load periods in the MG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207