MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Discrete-Time Higher-Order Sliding Mode Current Controller for Switched Reluctance Motor Drives

2023· article· en· W4391423946 on OpenAlexaff
Gustavo Xavier Prestes, Adailton Braga Júnior, Filipe Pinarello Scalcon, Lucas Rossato Rocha, Wagner Barreto da Silveira, H.A. Gründling, Rodrigo Padilha Vieira

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Switched reluctance motorController (irrigation)TorqueBenchmark (surveying)Computer scienceParametric statisticsParticle swarm optimizationDiscrete time and continuous timeReluctance motorMathematicsAlgorithmControl (management)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a high-tracking capability current controller based on discrete-time super-twisting sliding mode with equivalent control action for a switched reluctance motor (SRM). The detailed description of the equivalent control action in discrete-time is presented with parametric variation approach. The default reference of current controller is based on toque sharing function. Root-mean-squares (RSMEs) of current and torque phase tracking criterion are used as optimization objectives to design optimal gains through particle swarm algorithm. Comparison analysis with benchmark current controllers for variable speed operation shows the superior performance in current tracking, torque ripple mitigation and lower chattering effect, as with two delay samples tracking error implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207