MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391438933 · doi:10.1161/str.55.suppl_1.tp29

Abstract TP29: Neurodegenerative Plasma Biomarker Associations With Cognitive Resilience in Adults With High White Matter Hyperintensity Volume: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial Memory & Cognition in Decreased Hypertension (SPRINT MIND)

2024· article· en· W4391438933 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eric Stulberg

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCognitive declineCardiologyConfoundingBlood pressureEndocrinologyGerontologyOncologyDiseaseCognitive impairmentDementia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Although high cerebral white matter hyperintensity volume (WMHv) is associated with cognitive decline, many adults with high WMHv show no cognitive deficits. Neurodegenerative plasma biomarkers may be associated with cognitive decline via vascular processes causing higher WMHv such as cerebral amyloid angiopathy & inflammatory small vessel disease. We determined associations of plasma amyloid β 42 (AB42), amyloid β 40 (AB40), AB42/AB40, total tau, & neurofilament light chain (NfL) with cognitive resilience (CR) in adults with high WMHv using baseline MRIs & measurements from SPRINT MIND. Methods: This study included baseline data from 186 SPRINT MIND participants who were in the highest WMHv tertile & had available plasma biomarker concentrations & Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores. We defined CR two ways: A) MoCA score >25 or B) MoCA score >22. We determined univariate & adjusted odds ratios (OR) & 90% confidence intervals (CI) for each aforementioned plasma biomarker with CR. Confounders in adjusted models were: age, sex, race-ethnicity (Non-Hispanic white, Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, or other) education (no college education, college education, or post-graduate education), smoking history (never smoker, prior smoker, or current smoker) physical activity (0, 1-4, or ≥ 5 days of vigorous physical activity), diabetes, having insurance, & average systolic blood pressure. Residual confounding and effect modification by WMHv were tested in sensitivity analyses. Results: In our sample, the mean age was 72.6 years, 45.7% were female & 66% were Non-Hispanic white. The median WMHv was 10.0 cm 3 (25%-75% range: 6.3 - 16.9 cm 3 ). . CR defined as MoCA scores > 25 & >22 was present in 28.5% & 56.5% of participants respectively. Lower plasma AB40 was marginally associated with CR using a MoCa cutoff of >25 (OR 1.003, 90% CI: 1.001-1.006) in univariate analyses. There were no other significant (P>0.1) univariate or adjusted associations between plasma biomarkers with CR using either MoCa cutoff, nor significant confounding or effect modification by WMHv (P> 0.1). Conclusion: There were no significant adjusted associations between any plasma biomarker with CR. Future work should identify factors associated with CR in adults with high WMHv.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207