MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391443984 · doi:10.31234/osf.io/qa246

What I think she thinks about my body: Social inferences about disability-related content in anosognosia for hemiplegia

2024· preprint· en· W4391443984 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sahba Besharati, Paul M. Jenkinson, Michael D. Kopelman, Mark Solms, Cristina Bulgarelli, Valentina Pacella, Valentina Moro, Aikaterini Fotopoulou

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaNational Research FoundationBritish Psychological SocietyErnest Oppenheimer Memorial TrustBritish Neuropsychological SocietyCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsAnosognosiaContent (measure theory)PsychologyCognitive psychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationDevelopmental psychologyPsychiatryMedicineMathematicsCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The neuropsychological disorder of anosognosia for hemiplegia (AHP) can offer unique insights into the neurocognitive processes of body consciousness and representation. Previous studies have found associations between selective social cognition deficits and anosognosia. In this study, we examine how such social cognition deficits may directly interact with representations of one’s body as disabled in AHP. To this end, we modified a set of previously validated Theory of Mind stories to create content that was related to post-stroke paralysis and to investigate differences between right hemisphere damage patients with (n = 19) and without (n = 19) AHP. We expected AHP patients to perform worse than controls when trying to infer paralysis-related mental states, and explored whether such differences further depended on the kind of inference patients were asked to perform (e.g. from a first versus a third person perspective). Using an advanced structural neuroimaging technique, we expected selective social cognitive deficits to be associated with posterior parietal cortex lesions, and the difficulty to associate self -beliefs with paralysis during mentalising to be associated with frontoparietal disconnections. Group and individual level results revealed that AHP patients performed worse than HP controls when trying to infer paralysis-related mental states, possibly driven by both social cognition deficits per se and more specific difficulties to take the perspective of paralysed individual. Lesion analyses results were significant only at exploratory levels, revealing some of the hypothesised lesions but also unexpected white matter disconnections in the posterior body and splenium of the corpus collosum as related to deficits-related self-referent perspective taking. The study has implications for the multi-layered nature of body awareness, including abstract, social perspectives and beliefs about the body.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric DysfunctionFrench-language works237,207