MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391443984 · doi:10.31234/osf.io/qa246

What I think she thinks about my body: Social inferences about disability-related content in anosognosia for hemiplegia

2024· preprint· en· W4391443984 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaNational Research FoundationBritish Psychological SocietyErnest Oppenheimer Memorial TrustBritish Neuropsychological SocietyCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsAnosognosiaContent (measure theory)PsychologyCognitive psychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationDevelopmental psychologyPsychiatryMedicineMathematicsCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The neuropsychological disorder of anosognosia for hemiplegia (AHP) can offer unique insights into the neurocognitive processes of body consciousness and representation. Previous studies have found associations between selective social cognition deficits and anosognosia. In this study, we examine how such social cognition deficits may directly interact with representations of one’s body as disabled in AHP. To this end, we modified a set of previously validated Theory of Mind stories to create content that was related to post-stroke paralysis and to investigate differences between right hemisphere damage patients with (n = 19) and without (n = 19) AHP. We expected AHP patients to perform worse than controls when trying to infer paralysis-related mental states, and explored whether such differences further depended on the kind of inference patients were asked to perform (e.g. from a first versus a third person perspective). Using an advanced structural neuroimaging technique, we expected selective social cognitive deficits to be associated with posterior parietal cortex lesions, and the difficulty to associate self -beliefs with paralysis during mentalising to be associated with frontoparietal disconnections. Group and individual level results revealed that AHP patients performed worse than HP controls when trying to infer paralysis-related mental states, possibly driven by both social cognition deficits per se and more specific difficulties to take the perspective of paralysed individual. Lesion analyses results were significant only at exploratory levels, revealing some of the hypothesised lesions but also unexpected white matter disconnections in the posterior body and splenium of the corpus collosum as related to deficits-related self-referent perspective taking. The study has implications for the multi-layered nature of body awareness, including abstract, social perspectives and beliefs about the body.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.371
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it