MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391444240 · doi:10.1101/2024.01.31.578182

Diversification of molecular pattern recognition in bacterial NLR-like proteins

2024· preprint· en· W4391444240 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Nathalie Béchon, Nitzan Tal, Avigail Stokar-Avihail, Sarah Melamed, Gil Amitai, Rotem Sorek

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAzrieli FoundationDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsBiologyProtein subunitPattern recognition receptorPhage displayBacteriophageEscherichia coliGeneticsMolecular biologyMicrobiologyCell biologyGeneInnate immune systemReceptorAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Antiviral STANDs (Avs) are bacterial anti-phage proteins that are evolutionarily related to immune pattern recognition receptors of the NLR family. Following recognition of a conserved phage protein, Avs proteins exhibit cellular toxicity and abort phage propagation by killing the infected cell. Type 2 Avs proteins (Avs2) were suggested to recognize the large terminase subunit of the phage as a signature of phage infection. Here, we show that while Avs2 from Klebsiella pneumoniae (KpAvs2) can be activated when heterologously co-expressed with the terminase of phage SECphi18, during infection in vivo KpAvs2 recognizes a different phage protein, named KpAvs2-stimulating protein 1 (Ksap1). We show that KpAvs2 directly binds Ksap1 to become activated, and that phages mutated in Ksap1 can escape KpAvs2 defense despite encoding an intact terminase. Our results exemplify the evolutionary diversification of molecular pattern recognition in bacterial Avs2 proteins, and highlight that pattern recognition during infection can differ from results obtained using heterologous co-expression assays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicBacteriophages and microbial interactions→French-language works237,207→