MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391447607 · doi:10.1161/str.55.suppl_1.wmp72

Abstract WMP72: Accurate LVO and MeVO Detection Using a Multiphase CT Angiography Perfusion-Based Tool

2024· article· en· W4391447607 on OpenAlexaff
Luis A. Souto Maior Neto, Rotem Golan, Muhammad Usman Sadiq, Chris Duszynski, Bijoy K. Menon

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical CentreCircle Cardiovascular Imaging
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOcclusionRadiologyReceiver operating characteristicStroke (engine)AngiographyArea under the curveArea under curvePerfusionNuclear medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aims: Early and accurate detection of vessel occlusion is essential for the management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Current automated occlusion detection tools mostly rely on single-phase CTA (sCTA), which makes it challenging to accurately identify Medium Vessel Occlusions (MeVO). Multiphase CTA (mCTA), which consist of an additional two low-dose scans to the traditional CTA workflow, may be able to allow precise detection of MeVO occlusions. In this work, we aim to validate StrokeSENS mCTA Occlusion Detection in its ability to detect LVOs and MeVOs up to and including the M3/A3/P3 segments of the Middle/Anterior/Posterior Cerebral Arteries (MCA/ACA/PCA). Methods: Validation was performed on 512 studies of suspected AIS patients with baseline mCTA. Studies had MeVO (PCA:11, ACA:4, MCA:83), LVO (ICA:116, PCA:8, MCA:263), and no occlusion: 27. Expert neuroradiologists annotated the presence and location of the occlusion. StrokeSENS mCTA Occlusion Detection processed mCTA data to produce hypoperfusion extent probability maps, and presence or absence of occlusion. To validate the ability of the tool to detect occlusion, we used ROC analysis, specificaly the AUC and Sensitivity/Specificity metrics. Results: The full cohort AUC was 96.7% (95% C.I.: [94.7%,97.7%]). For LVO subgroups, ICA AUC=98.2%, MCA AUC=98.0%, PCA AUC=68.5%. For MeVO, MCA AUC=95.0%, ACA AUC=78%, PCA AUC=91.2%. At the selected operational point, overall Sensitivity was 86.0% (95% C.I.: [0.829, 0.891], N=485), and Specificity was 92.6% (95% C.I.: [0.766, 0.979], N=27). Figure 1 shows examples of the hypoperfusion extent produced by the tool for LVO and MeVO cases. Conclusion: In this work, we evaluated the tool StrokeSENS Occlusion Detection in its ability to detect LVO and MeVO occlusions. The tool has shown very high accuracy in detection occlusions up to and including the M3/A3/P3 segments of the Middle/Anterior/Posterior Cerebral Arteries (MCA/ACA/PCA).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→