MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391448073 · doi:10.1161/str.55.suppl_1.tp147

Abstract TP147: Assessment of Inter-Rater Reliability of Fazekas Scoring on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease

2024· article· en· W4391448073 on OpenAlexaff
Aoife Haughey, Roisin M. O’Cearbhaill, Joanna D. Schaafsma, Kevin H.M. Kuo, Igor Gomes Padilha, Stéphanie Forté

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalToronto Western HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingInter-rater reliabilityDiseaseNuclear magnetic resonancePathologyRadiologyRating scale

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: White matter disease is a common phenomenon in patients with sickle cell disease, that has been linked to cognitive impairment. However, there is no standardized approach for quantification of the cerebral disease burden. The Fazekas score is widely used to quantify the burden of white matter disease in chronic small vessel disease. However, its utility in sickle cell disease has not yet been established. We aimed to assess its, interrater reliability in this patient population. Methods: A patient cohort was compiled for the purpose of a research ethics board (REB) approved retrospective study of consecutive adult patients with sickle cell disease, each of whom underwent MRI/MRA between the year 2017 and 2019. All MRI/MRA studies were performed on 3-Tesla MRI. Two neuroradiologists independently assessed the axial FLAIR MRI brain sequence, for all patients, with the sole focus of assigning a Fazekas score (0-3) to each study, as a means of quantifying the burden of ischemic white matter lesions. The neuroradiologists were blinded to the scoring assigned by their counterpart and to the clinical information. Cohen’s weighted Kappa was used as a measure of agreement between readers. Results: Ninety patients with a median age of 31 and 45/90 (50%) women were included. The expected agreement was 74.65%, with an observed agreement of 94.44% between readers, with a weighted Kappa of 0.7808. Conclusion: On the basis of this study, there is good inter-rater reliability of Fazekas scoring on axial FLAIR MRI brain sequence in patients with sickle cell disease, even though the underlying pathophysiology of white matter lesions in this patient population might vary compared to individuals with chronic small vessel disease. The Fazekas is a promising measure that could easily be integrated in systematic evaluation of cerebrovascular lesions of adults with sickle cell disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.027
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.056
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0270.056
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicTraditional Chinese Medicine StudiesFrench-language works237,207