MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391448308 · doi:10.1161/str.55.suppl_1.tp204

Abstract TP204: Performance of Rapidai NCCT Stroke Software in Colombia's Early Stroke System: Preliminary Results

2024· article· en· W4391448308 on OpenAlexaff
Manuel F. Granja, Karen Ramirez, Laura Espinel, Antonio J. Salazar, Juan Armando Mejía, Oscar Tórres, Aníbal J. Morillo, Sonia Bermúdez, Nicolás Useche, Gregory W. Albers

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)RadiologyAngiographyAcute strokeIschemic strokeContrast (vision)Internal medicineIschemiaArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Automated stroke solutions in developing countries have the potential to reduce healthcare gaps. This study assesses the performance of the RAPID NCCT Stroke module compared to local neuroradiologists’ evaluation of acute stroke. Methods: Rapid NCCT stroke is a new multi-module AI tool that simultaneously evaluates non-contrast CT scans (NCCT) for ICH (any subtype, volume >0.4 ml), the ASPECT score, and suspicion of LVO (i.e., intracranial ICA or horizontal segment of the MCA). The software determines suspicion of LVO based on an algorithm that evaluates the hyperdense MCA sign and early ischemic changes in the MCA territory. Consensus readings were defined by three blinded neuroradiologists based on a subset of Non-contrast CTs obtained between January 2013 to December 2018 at Fundacion Santa Fe De Bogota University Hospital. The overall diagnostic performance of the RAPID NCCT was compared to the assessments made by the neuroradiologists. Results: 179 total stroke cases with technically adequate NCCT scans were identified. Based on the consensus of the neuroradiologists, these cases included 151 ischemic strokes, 27 ICHs >0.4 ml, 1 ICH <0.4 ml, and 28 LVO cases (verified by CT angiography). The Rapid NCCT Stroke module demonstrated high specificity (96%), NPV (98%), and accuracy (95%) for the detection of ICH. For determining the ASPECT score, the software had a specificity of 93% and an NPV of 76%. Seventy percent of the CTA-verified LVOs were detected from NCCT alone with a specificity and NPV of 82%. Conclusions: The RAPID NCCT Stroke software displayed promising results for the early identification of ICH and characterization of ischemic strokes. The software identified 70% of the LVOs from NCCT alone. This tool can potentially enhance patient outcomes by bridging healthcare gaps in evolving stroke systems. Multicenter studies in additional Latin American countries are needed for further validation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→