MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391455314 · doi:10.1109/icfpt59805.2023.00065

Journal Track Paper ICFPT 2023 : HyBNN: Quantifying and Optimizing Hardware Efficiency of Binary Neural Networks

2023· article· en· W4391455314 on OpenAlexaff
Geng Yang, Jie Lei, Zhenman Fang, Yunsong Li, Jiaqing Zhang, Weiying Xie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceQuantization (signal processing)Floating pointComputer hardwareOverhead (engineering)Hardware accelerationDeep learningBinary numberArtificial neural networkConvolution (computer science)Computer engineeringFLOPSAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceField-programmable gate arrayParallel computingMathematicsArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Binary neural network (BNN), where both the weight and the activation values are represented with one bit, provides an attractive alternative to deploy highly efficient deep learning inference on resource-constrained edge devices. However, our investigation reveals that, to achieve satisfactory accuracy gains, state-of-the-art (SOTA) BNNs, such as FracBNN and ReActNet, usually have to incorporate various auxiliary floating-point components and increase the model size, which in turn degrades the hardware performance efficiency. In this paper, we aim to quantify such hardware inefficiency in SOTA BNNs and further mitigate it with negligible accuracy loss. First, we observe that the auxiliary floating-point (AFP) components consume an average of 93% DSPs, 46% LUTs, and 62% FFs, among the entire BNN accelerator resource utilization. To mitigate such overhead, we propose a novel algorithm-hardware co-design, called FuseBNN, to fuse those AFP operators without hurting the accuracy. On average, FuseBNN reduces AFP resource utilization to 59% DSPs, 13% LUTs, and 16% FFs.Second, SOTA BNNs often use the compact MobileNetV1 as the backbone network but have to replace the lightweight 3×3 depth-wise convolution (DWC) with the 3×3 standard convolution (SC, e.g., in ReActNet and our ReActNet-adapted BaseBNN) or even more complex fractional 3×3 SC (e.g., in FracBNN) to bridge the accuracy gap. As a result, the model parameter size is significantly increased and becomes 2.25× larger than that of the 4-bit direct quantization with the original DWC (4-Bit-Net); the number of multiply-accumulate operations is also significantly increased so that the overall LUT resource usage of BaseBNN is almost the same as that of 4-Bit-Net. To address this issue, we propose HyBNN, where we binarize depth-wise separation convolution (DSC) blocks for the first time to decrease the model size and incorporate 4-bit DSC blocks to compensate for the accuracy loss.For the ship detection task in synthetic aperture radar imagery on the AMD-Xilinx ZCU102 FPGA, HyBNN achieves a detection accuracy of 94.8% and a detection speed of 615 frames per second (FPS), which is 6.8× faster than FuseBNN+ (94.9% accuracy) and 2.7× faster than 4-Bit-Net (95.9% accuracy). For image classification on the CIFAR-10 dataset on the AMD-Xilinx Ultra96-V2 FPGA, HyBNN achieves 1.5× speedup and 0.7% better accuracy over SOTA FracBNN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.135

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207