The Impact of Occupational Therapy on Motor Function and Activities of Daily Living in Stroke Survivors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current study aims to examine the impact of occupational therapy on motor function and activities of daily living in stroke survivors. It presents a quasi-experimental study assessing the effect of occupational therapy on enhancing motor function and ADLs in stroke survivors. The study involved 30 participants divided into control and experimental groups. The measures include Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Significant improvements were observed in the experimental group in both motor function and ADLs, as shown by ANOVA and post-hoc tests. The findings highlight the efficacy of occupational therapy in facilitating recovery and improving quality of life post-stroke, integrating traditional approaches with innovative technologies. The study also shows the necessity of occupational therapy in stroke rehabilitation and its holistic impact on physical recovery and patient well-being. For healthcare systems, these findings show the importance of allocating resources towards occupational therapy services for stroke survivors. This includes investing in advanced rehabilitation equipment and ensuring adequate staffing. Additionally, healthcare systems should consider developing collaborative models of care that involve multidisciplinary teams, including occupational therapists, to provide comprehensive and holistic treatment for stroke survivors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it