Perubahan Kepribadian Penderita Stroke dan Kecemasan pada Caregiver Stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stroke sufferers are unable to independently meet their daily needs, most have difficulty controlling their emotions. Changes in the personality of stroke sufferers are one of the complaints that are often conveyed by caretakers or caregivers of stroke sufferers. The aim of this study is to find out the description of changes in the personality of stroke patients and anxiety to caregivers in the work area of the Sihepeng Mandailing Natal Health Center in 2021. The research design is descriptive with cross-sectional approach. The population in this study were caregivers of 29 stroke sufferers. The sampling technique in this study was total sampling so that a total sample of 29 people was obtained. The results showed that 19 respondents (65.5%) had positive personality changes and 48.3% (14 respondents) had no anxiety in the anxiety category. This study recommends that caregivers be able to have a positive effect in providing care and be able to accept personality changes that occur in stroke sufferers. All family members must be able to provide positive support to each other so that the stroke patient feels better so that anxiety does not occur in the caregiver.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".