Weight gain during nutritional rehabilitation post-childhood malnutrition may influence the associations between adulthood desaturases activity and anthro-cardiometabolic risk factors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS & AIMS: Childhood malnutrition is a major global health problem with long-term sequelae, including non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Mechanisms are unknown but may involve metabolic programming, resulting from "short-term" solutions to optimise survival by compromising non-priority organs. As key players in lipid metabolism, desaturases have been shown to be predictive of NCDs. We hypothesised that the association between specific desaturase activities and NCD risk determinants (including body composition, serum glucose, insulin levels, and blood pressure) are influenced by childhood post-malnutrition weight gain. METHODS: 278 Afro-Caribbean adults with well-documented clinical history of severe malnutrition in childhood were studied. Extensive metabolic analyses including body composition (DXA), fasting serum glucose and lipidomics (n = 101), and fasting serum insulin (n = 83) were performed in malnutrition survivors and matched community controls (n = 90). Established lipid ratios were used as proxies of desaturase activities: CE 16:1/CE 16:0 for stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD1), LysoPC 20:4/20:3 for fatty acid desaturase 1 (FADS1), and LysoPC 20:3/18:2 for FADS2. RESULTS: Compared to community controls, adult malnutrition survivors (mean ± SD) age 28.3 ± 7.8 and BMI 23.6 ± 5.2 had higher SCD1 and FADS1 activity, (B ± SE) 0.07 ± 0.02 and 0.7 ± 0.08, respectively, but lower FADS2 activities (B ± SE) -0.05 ± 0.01, adjusted for sex and age (p < 0.0005). SCD1 was positively associated with adult BMI and body fat percentage, and negatively associated with lean mass and height. Stratification based on weight gain during nutritional rehabilitation among malnutrition survivors might signal the potential associations between weight gain during that critical period, desaturase activities, and some of adult metabolic parameters, with the lowest tertiles (slowest catch-up weight gain) performing more similarly to controls. CONCLUSIONS: In adult survivors of early-life severe acute malnutrition, desaturase activity is associated with markers of NCD risk, especially adiposity. These associations seem to be strengthened by faster weight gain during nutritional rehabilitation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".