MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391464737 · doi:10.5874/jfsr.23.30.3_7

Zen-Noh’s Initiatives and Issues for Stable Procurement of Grains & Oilseeds, etc. from Overseas

2023· article· en· W4391464737 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Food System Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLogistics and Infrastructure Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report reviews the initiatives made by Zen-Noh (National Federation of Agricultural Co-operative Associations) in its efforts to ensure stable procurement of Grains, Oilseeds and Fertilizers from overseas, and discusses future challenges. The 1970s was a time when grain and oilseeds were used as political weapons, as world demand expanded dramatically, while droughts and conflicts broke out in various regions, and the U.S. government imposed embargoes. Zen-Noh established Zen-Noh Grain Corporation in 1979 and acquired CGB Enterprises Inc. in 1988 to build up its own supply chain between the US and Japan. Since 2000, some structural changes have occurred in the global grain and oilseed markets. Zen-Noh have been tackling those changes by strengthening its procurement and export capacity expansion in the US, as well as investing into the supply chains in Brazil and Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.767
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.176
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it