Structural Analysis of the Food System of Imported Rapeseed
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines four key aspects of stable oilseed procurement, providing insights into the overall structure of the rapeseed food system imported from Canada to Japan. Firstly, we present an overview of the current situation and challenges associated with the procurement of imported rapeseed in Japan. Secondly, we clarify the vertical coordination system, shedding light on potential future access to rapeseed export channels from Canada. Thirdly, we analyze the decision-making process for determining optimal quantities of imported rapeseed and explore alternative options. Lastly, we examine power imbalances within the vertical stages of the rapeseed food system from an equity perspective. The study concludes with policy implications as follows: (1) Under a trading structure with price mechanism functions, it is necessary to create an environment in which the Japanese vegetable oil industry can pass on high raw material prices to consumers to ensure competitive and stable raw material procurement; (2) It is essential to establish stable and close political relationships between countries; (3) When considering alternative oil and fat products, confirming Japanese consumer evaluations is necessary; and (4) Since the expansion of biodiesel production in various countries could be detrimental to Japan's food security, its merits and demerits must be evaluated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it