Online Systemic Energy Management Strategy of Fuel Cell System With Efficiency Enhancement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Temperature plays a crucial role in efficiency improvement and lifespan extension of the fuel cell system which encourages energy management strategy (EMS) taking thermal into consideration. However, sluggish thermal response prevents the fuel cell performance from tracking the optimal states during scenarios with significant power variations, which was disregarded in the previous works. To solve this issue, an online hydrogen consumption minimization guarantee strategy (HCMG) including thermal management is proposed which is divided into two parts: 1) primary power distribution strategy, where a model predictive control (MPC) based EMS is employed herein to distribute power between fuel cell and battery with the objectives of minimizing hydrogen consumption as well as maintaining the state of charge (SOC), and 2) HCMG, where a modified MPC based method is exploited herein to track the reference power and optimal temperature with minimum hydrogen consumption by adjusting both the duty cycle of fan and fuel cell current. The presented approach ascertains hydrogen consumption reduction for 3.448% even under relatively extensive power changes, during which the temperature cannot reach the optimal value in a brief time. The real-time simulation results show the effectiveness of the proposed technique compared with previous EMS methods under various driving cycles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".