TPA: Two‐stage progressive attention segmentation framework for hepatocellular carcinoma on multi‐modality MRI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and measurement of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The multi-modality information contained in the multi-phase images of DCE-MRI is important for improving segmentation. However, this remains a challenging task due to the heterogeneity of HCC, which may cause one HCC lesion to have varied imaging appearance in each phase of DCE-MRI. In particular, some phases exhibit inconsistent sizes and boundaries will result in a lack of correlation between modalities, and it may pose inaccurate segmentation results. PURPOSE: We aim to design a multi-modality segmentation model that can learn meaningful inter-phase correlation for achieving HCC segmentation. METHODS: In this study, we propose a two-stage progressive attention segmentation framework (TPA) for HCC based on the transformer and the decision-making process of radiologists. Specifically, the first stage aims to fuse features from multi-phase images to identify HCC and provide localization region. In the second stage, a multi-modality attention transformer module (MAT) is designed to focus on the features that can represent the actual size. RESULTS: We conduct training, validation, and test in a single-center dataset (386 cases), followed by external test on a batch of multi-center datasets (83 cases). Furthermore, we analyze a subgroup of data with weak inter-phase correlation in the test set. The proposed model achieves Dice coefficient of 0.822 and 0.772 in the internal and external test sets, respectively, and 0.829, 0.791 in the subgroup. The experimental results demonstrate that our model outperforms state-of-the-art models, particularly within subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed TPA provides best segmentation results, and utilizing clinical prior knowledge for network design is practical and feasible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".