Pityriasis rubra pilaris secondary to viral infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
of Dermatology (OKD) of the University Hospital in Krakow, who developed symptoms of PRP after a viral infection, and provide insights into the nature of the disease. Case reportA 67-year-old male patient, a retired entrepreneur, was admitted to the OKD for the diagnosis and treatment of rapidly progressive erythematous papular skin rash.The first skin lesions, presenting as erythema on the face and palms, appeared approximately 2 weeks prior to hospitalisation.Subsequently, ery-abstraCt Introduction: Pityriasis rubra pilaris is a rare, chronic dermatosis presenting with erythema and papular eruptions as well as characteristic perifollicular hyperkeratosis and 'islands of sparing' (normal appearing skin).In the literature, there are reports of cases where symptoms of infection preceded the onset of pityriasis rubra pilaris.Objective: Presentation of the case of a 67-year-old patient with type I pityriasis rubra pilaris to highlight the possible association between pityriasis rubra pilaris with infectious agents.Case report: A 67-year-old patient was referred to hospital because of rapidly progressive erythematous papular skin rash preceded by symptoms of an upper respiratory tract infection.On physical examination, attention was drawn to perifollicular papules covered with cap-like scales as well as confluent erythema and features of hyperkeratosis on the hands and feet.Based on the clinical presentation and histopathological findings, type I pityriasis rubra pilaris was diagnosed and treatment with acitretin was initiated.Conclusions: Infectious agents have the potential to be a trigger for pityriasis rubra pilaris.Acitretin continues to demonstrate efficacy in the treatment of pityriasis rubra pilaris.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".