MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391474941 · doi:10.1080/08974454.2024.2307893

Access and Equity of Legal Support Services for Racialized Survivors of Sexual Violence

2024· article· en· W4391474941 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alicia Boatswain‐Kyte, Rusan Lateef

Bibliographic record

VenueWomen & Criminal Justice · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEquity (law)Gender equitySexual violenceCriminologyPsychologySexual minorityDemographic economicsSexual orientationPolitical scienceBusinessClinical psychologySociologySocial psychologyGender studiesLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Existing research reveals that survivors of sexual violence (SSV) face barriers in reporting sexual assault, such as fear of the criminal justice process. These barriers are more complex for racialized SSV, whose unique needs and experiences may differ from White SSV. In order to increase accessibility of legal support for SSV, a project offering free legal services in Canada was developed to support survivors by providing them with the legal information necessary to make informed decisions about reporting. One of the primary goals of the project was to tailor services to racialized SSV in order to ensure equitable access to justice for this population. This paper presents the outcomes of these efforts from multiple stakeholders involved in the project’s implementation. Our findings reveal important considerations for what constitutes justice for racialized SSV, and the importance of centering them in the design and implementation of support services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.760

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWomen & Criminal JusticeSame topicSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesFrench-language works237,207