MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391475395 · doi:10.5962/p.363853

Review of the status of the Northern Abalone, Haliotis kamtschatkana, in Canada

2001· article· en· W4391475395 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Glen Jamieson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Field-Naturalist · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbaloneFisheryHaliotisGeographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Northern Abalone (Haliotis kamtschatkana) is the only abalone species in Canada and is widely distributed along the entire outer coast of British Columbia.In the late 1970s and 1980, there was a commercial fishery, but following a peak in landings in [1978][1979], landings rapidly declined.Its distribution in commercially exploitable concentrations is patchy, making stock assessments difficult to conduct.However, in the late 1980s, consistently low estimated abundance levels and increasing evidence for a substantial illegal harvest of abalone raised conservation concerns, resulting in aboriginal, recreational and commercial fisheries closures in 1990.Studies in other abalone species suggest that abalone larvae disperse over relatively short distances.If true for Northern Abalone as well, then this species may be particularly vulnerable to localised extirpations.Through the 1990s, there was no evidence of significant Northern Abalone recruitment along Canada's Pacific coast, and because of a high price, abalone poaching is still occurring.Expansion in the range of Sea Otters (Enhydra lutris), a major abalone predator, is also increasing natural mortality.Given these circumstances, a COSEWIC status of "threatened" was recommended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.444
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Field-NaturalistSame topicMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture StudiesFrench-language works237,207