Pandora's Poison: Chlorine, Health, and a New Environmental Strategy, by Joe Thornton [Review]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is a thick, formidable book.It presents a compelling, seemingly irrefutable position: that production, use, and disposal of chlorine gas and its chemicals, a phenomenon of the past century, is bad for us, bad for society, and bad for the environment.The author has achieved his aim of a readable essay, while his figures, tables, appendices, and about a thousand references, offer detailed documentation.Chlorine itself is an effective bleach and a disinfectant.Chlorine gas does not occur naturally, but industry now produces 40 million tons of it annually.This man-made gas is the feedstock for 11 000 organochlorine compounds including plastics, pesticides, and solvents.Chlorination decreases a chemical's stability, making it more reactive, and usually more toxic.And while some of these pollutants may degrade in less than a year in the temperate climates in which they are produced, they may last for centuries near the frigid poles, which become the ultimate global sinks.Organochlorines are now "ubiquitous on a global scale."Sadly, scientists assigned to investigate the degree of toxicity of the commonest chlorine compounds have followed the Risk Paradigm.They tend to calculate only the Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level (LOAEL), or the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL).Each chemical is studied separately.Yet, any exposure to any organic chlorine compound carries some risk of mutations, of cancer, of endocrine disruption (including infertility), of neurotoxicity, and of subclinical effects, among others.Thornton, in striking contrast to industry, advocates the Ecological Paradigm, because, as Canadian ecologist Glen A. Fox has pointed out, "health damage occurs on a continuum."The Ecological Paradigm, a holistic approach, views all organochlorines as "end products unified by a single history, a common economic dynamic, and a single root material."There is no safe dose.A central tenet is the precautionary principle.For this, the first rule is Reverse Onus, which means erring on the side of caution.The second is Zero Discharge and the third is Clean Production.Houston, C Stuart.2001."Pandora's Poison: Chlorine, Health, and a New Environmental Strategy, by Joe Thornton [Review]."The
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".