MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391475494 · doi:10.5962/p.363835

Hyperthermia induced mortality of gravid Snapping Turtles, Chelydra serpentina, and eggs in a wood chip pile

2001· article· en· W4391475494 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Shane R. de Solla, Christine A. Bishop

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Field-Naturalist · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicTurtle Biology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChelydraHyperthermiaPileThermoregulationBiologyZoologyMedicineGeologyEcologyInternal medicineTurtle (robot)Geotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two gravid female Snapping Turtles (Chelydra serpentina) were observed attempting to nest in a composting wood chip pile, on the shoreline of the west end of Coote's Paradise, Hamilton, Ontario, on 7-10 June 1999.Instead of laying eggs, both females buried themselves within the wood chip pile, and were found dead the following day.An autopsy revealed that both females were still gravid, and that the likely cause of death was hyperthermia and dehydration.Four clutches of eggs were also found in the wood chip pile after the cessation of nesting; one clutch was incubated in laboratory conditions but none of the eggs hatched.Subsequent dissection of all of the clutches revealed no development.Subsurface temperatures from the wood chip pile on 10 July 1999 ranged from 28 °C to 60 °C.On 8 August 2000, one clutch was found in the same wood chip pile, in which some eggs successfully hatched when incubated artificially.Artificial compost heaps near nesting sites may pose a risk for nesting turtles, through both adult mortality and reduced hatching success.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.405
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Field-NaturalistSame topicTurtle Biology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207